One thing leads to another
The only way to make something new is to remain classic, to respect classic forms. That’s how you create things that last, things that don’t rely on trends. ...... Respect the rules of the trade, don’t leave anything to chance, don’t let anything slip by, are very demanding and strict, and use those methods, That’s how you can create things that last, and stand up to the test of time. Rui Nogueira on Melville’s Gangster Films
Before I start I must find a structural basis for the painting. This had in the past taken the form of a numerical sequence that would control where things were placed on the canvas. For many years this was invariably the way I worked. It gave me a surprising amount of freedom. When I took the idea further to control the type of mark and the colour used it is in the nature of painting that many elements were still open to decision. Electing to paint a landscape or a portrait you also have many aspects controlled but equally many aspects free; my method mimics this. I want to paint slowly so every aspect can be thought about, this naturally takes away from the spontaneity but I have a preference (at odds with my time) for the considered image.
A notional landscape has invariably been present and that presence has often been readable by the viewer.
The painting occupies a flat plane but apart from a detour for a year from 1997 rarely have I abandoned the illusion of a third dimension. In the earlier work scale provides distance, later, and after I adopted the computer for “pre-compositional” exploration I worked in more than one layer, at first by using actual cut out layers in a three dimensional box. After I had started to work outside more consistently, the experience somehow, next time I did a studio painting, was to intertwined the layers, this unintentionally had echoes of cubism which I then pointed up.
The Vodňany sequence took this further, but here the superficial nod towards Cubism hides behind it the more overt tribute to Poussin. Before I had the idea that they would be based on a bridge in Vodňany I wanted to make a set of paintings to echo a group of landscapes Poussin did around 1648, and that was the reason these paintings came into existence.
Ossia unwinds this and moves back towards the previous paintings where I had wanted the layers to be easily read. To be easily read was part of my metaphor that they should have the feel of a set of studies akin to those of Debussy or Ligeti, Overtly studies in technique but riding upon poetic or even metaphysical concerns.
Up until the fifth Ossia the way the material is manipulated is fairly clear, after that I wanted more ambiguity and at the same time echoes of the landscape which had been part of the initial conception and is readable in the first two but not so apparent again until number ten.
Initially I thought I would have a cycle of fourteen paintings but on getting to the twelfth with it’s far from ambiguous echo of a landscape I thought that perhaps I could have a second cycle, more scherzando, and I now have the first of these underway. The first two of these have become much looser than I intended, I realise they have echoes of some watercolours I did in 1981 that I never followed through.
Each Ossia was always supposed to have a matching landscape, hence the Edge of Forest sequence. I only had time to finish four of these last summer. These four match with their respective Ossias which are Numbers 1, 6, 10 and 12.
Recently it became apparent that I could continue these as a stand alone cycle. The left of the canvas being based on the Ossia the right of the canvas based on the forest. On starting to plan these out the idea came of echoing each landscape as a symmetrical structure on a similarly sized canvas, it’s best not to explain this too well as I need room to manoeuvre!
At 80 x 120 these are the largest paintings I have tackled for many years.





